Search for: "Actavis Incorporated" Results 1 - 20 of 32
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2014, 5:00 am by D Daniel Sokol
Baumann Economists Incorporated John Payne Bigelow Compass Lexecon Barry C Harris, Economists Incorporated, Kevin M. [read post]
27 Feb 2021, 5:21 am by Rose Hughes
 "Incorporation": The 3rd Actavis question and a less-is-more approach to patent draftingIn CoolMPS, an unlabelled nucleotide is first incorporated. [read post]
26 Jun 2021, 2:59 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
The AmeriKat looking towardsa future of the Formstein defence from her own kitchen sinkIs Instagram Live actually live? [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 9:11 am
Actavis Elizabeth LLC, Anchen Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Anchen Incorporated (patent infringement) 10/6: Pfizer Inc., Pfizer Pharmaceuticals LLC, Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer Limited and CP Pharmaceuticals International CV v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 8:19 am by tracey
(Omega AG) (Omega Ltd.) [2012] EWHC 3440 (Ch) (30 November 2012) Cometson & Anor v Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council & Anor [2012] EWHC 3446 (Ch) (30 November 2012) High Court (Patents Court) Actavis Group HF v Eli Lilly & Company [2012] EWHC 3316 (Pat) (27 November 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Hussain v King Edward VII Hospital [2012] EWHC 3441 (QB) (30 November 2012) O’Dwyer v ITV Plc [2012] EWHC 3321 (QB) (30 November 2012) Harries v Stevenson… [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 1:40 pm by John Lewis
Defendants Actavis LLC and related entities (“Actavis”) and Shire together produce Intuniv’s generic counterpart. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Four Seasons Holdings Incorporated v Brownlie, heard 9-10 May 2017. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 6:02 am by Dennis Crouch
Actavis et al. (133 US 2223 [2013]), the Court instituted a “rule of reason” for courts to apply to such cases (Hovenkamp). [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 4:17 am
In relation to Nike Intl’s EP 1 571 938 "footwear incorporating a textile with fusible filaments and fibers" the German Federal Patent Court had previously declared that all claims invalid for lack of inventive step starting from the German published examined application ("Auslegeschrift") DE 1 085 173 of 1954 in combination with US 2,440,393 of 1948. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Eli Lilly & Co v Actavis UK Ltd & Ors, heard 4-6 Apr 2017. [read post]
15 May 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Eli Lilly & Co v Actavis UK Ltd & Ors, heard 4-6 Apr 2017. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Eli Lilly & Co v Actavis UK Ltd & Ors, heard 4-6 Apr 2017. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:20 am
For instance: when does the alteration of objects incorporating the protected work involve a new authorisation from the right holder? [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 7:59 am
Therefore, the Court finds Plaintiffs’ reading of TCL overbroad. . . .In other words, TCL does not hold that volume discounts incorporated into SEP licensing contracts under the ETSI Directives necessarily discriminate, but instead that sales volume alone is not a legitimate basis for such discounts. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 10:07 am
Insofar as it suggests that the skilled person will not assimilate the contents of long and complex documents which are cited as prior art, and relevant documents which are incorporated by reference in the prior art, then I disagree.The skilled person is deemed to read and assimilate a prior art document properly and with interest. [read post]
22 May 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Eli Lilly & Co v Actavis UK Ltd & Ors, heard 4-6 Apr 2017. [read post]